Mirjam Bjorklund vs Nika Radisic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Bjorklund vs N. Radisic

Mirjam Bjorklund
SWE
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
25
-
Height
-
752
C. Rank
789
123
Best Rank
330
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$508.7K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Nika Radisic
SLO
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
25
-
Height
-
752
C. Rank
789
123
Best Rank
330
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$508.7K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Bjorklund 1 - 0 Radisic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mirjam Bjorklund winning 2 and Nika Radisic winning 1. The last match between Mirjam Bjorklund and Nika Radisic was at the W25 Trieste, 03-09-2021, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Mirjam Bjorklund getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bjorklund | 1 |
| Radisic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W25 Trieste(09-03-21)
Mirjam Bjorklund
6
4
6
Nika Radisic
2
6
1
M. Bjorklund vs N. Radisic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $508,748 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.84% (219-147) | Career Total W/L | 52.69% (196-176) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Bjorklund vs N. Radisic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mirjam Bjorklund has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nika Radisic has won 40.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mirjam Bjorklund, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nika Radisic has won 49.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mirjam Bjorklund has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nika Radisic has saved 50.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mirjam Bjorklund has won 28.57% of matches played (W/L 2/5), with Nika Radisic winning 33.33% (W/L 11/22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mirjam Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 128/70), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/22). Nika Radisic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 182/151), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/12).
- Player level: In the last year, Mirjam Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 25.00% of matches (W/L 1/3), where as Nika Radisic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 11/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mirjam Bjorklund winning 1 times and Nika Radisic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mirjam Bjorklund winning 2 and Nika Radisic winning 1.
- The last match between Mirjam Bjorklund and Nika Radisic was at the W25 Trieste, 03-09-2021, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Mirjam Bjorklund getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:27:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mirjam Bjorklund has played against opponents with an average rank of 156.86 while Nika Radisic has played against players with an average rank of 415.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mirjam Bjorklund has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nika Radisic has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mirjam Bjorklund has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nika Radisic has converted 41.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Nika Radisic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Bjorklund vs N. Radisic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 9 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:27:0 | Average Match Time | 2:27:0 |
| 71% (68/96) | 1st Serve % | 69% (59/86) |
| 57% (39/68) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (28/59) |
| 50% (14/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 55% (47/86) | Return Points Win % | 45% (43/96) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Bjorklund 45%, Radisic 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Bjorklund 55%, Radisic 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Bjorklund 53%, Radisic 50%.
M. Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
N. Radisic Recent Matches Played

M. Bjorklund vs N. Radisic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.84% (219/147) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.69% (196/176) |
| 58.82% (487/341) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.30% (444/389) |
| 54.29% (4031/3394) | Games Win/Loss | 52.21% (3848/3522) |
| 55.66% (59/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (6/12) |
| 64.65% (128/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.65% (182/151) |
| 47.92% (23/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 538 | Aces Total | 323 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 602 | Total Double Faults | 657 |
| 1:28:13 | Average Match Time | 1:28:7 |
| 486.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.27 |
| 65% (14303/21932) | 1st Serve % | 65% (13572/20957) |
| 61% (8682/14303) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (7713/13572) |
| 47% (3579/7629) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3437/7385) |
| 47% (1461/3083) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1303/2707) |
| 47% (10586/22367) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9670/20686) |
| 62.96% (17/10) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (4/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 37.93% (11/18) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 62.21% (107/65) | Challenger W/L | 50.56% (136/133) |
| 66.10% (78/40) | Futures W/L | 60.00% (60/40) |
| 60% (215/356) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (193/364) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 53% (34/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (26/48) |
| 50% (51/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (39/91) |
| 87% (223/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (207/177) |
| 12% (223/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (207/30) |
| 16% (143/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (165/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:30 AM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
2.16
W2
1.6
06:30 AM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
1.3
W2
3.14
05:00 AM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
2.64
W2
1.41
05:00 AM 10/11/25
PredictionW1
2.33
W2
1.52
09:30 PM 08/11/25
PredictionW1
1.41
W2
2.64
07:00 AM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
2.68
W2
1.4
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
08 Nov 2025
Tucuman Open – Tucuman Preview And Prediction: Oleksandra Oliynykova vs Despina Papamichail Betting Tips & Picks November 9, 2025
08 Nov 2025
Iva Jovic vs Marina Stakusic Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Norrie Vs Tien H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Moselle Open 2025?
08 Nov 2025
Cameron Norrie vs Learner Tien Prediction – ATP Moselle Open – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina Prediction – WTA WTA Finals – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
Novak Djokovic vs Lorenzo Musetti Prediction – ATP Hellenic Championship – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
19:00
H2H 8-5
12:00
H2H 11-0
H2H 5-5
H2H 4-5
Tennis Events This Week
Hellenic Championship - Athens
Greece
Moselle Open - Metz
France
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Lyon Challenger
France
Matsuyama Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Taipei Challenger
Chinese Taipei
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Valledupar
Colombia
M25 East Lansing
United States
M25 Guadalajara
Mexico
M25 Montreal
Canada
M25 Santa Cruz do Sul
Brazil